Molecular Dx Significance 6/10

Amniotic fluid proteomic panel stratifies persistent versus transient fetal growth restriction

Investigators performed integrated proteomic and metabolomic profiling on amniotic fluid samples from pregnancies complicated by transient or persistent fetal growth restriction and healthy controls. A two-protein diagnostic panel targeting PDGFA and phospho-STAT5A achieved perfect discrimination in the discovery cohort and an AUC of 0.780 in an independent ELISA validation set of 69 samples, while a three-marker signature accurately predicted persistent growth failure with an AUC of 0.966. The study establishes a multi-omics framework for prenatal fetal growth restriction stratification, offering potential molecular tools to guide clinical decision-making and personalized management of high-risk pregnancies.

The original study

Integrated multi-omics profiling of amniotic fluid identifies predictive biomarkers for fetal growth restriction trajectories.

Authors
Cao Y, Hao W, Wang Y, Chai C, Li Y, Liu Y, et al.
Journal
Annals of medicine
Type
Journal Article
PMID
42603261
Read the original study →

Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a complex condition with highly heterogeneous clinical outcomes, making prenatal distinction between transient and persistent growth failure challenging. This study aims to identify amniotic fluid (AF) biomarkers capable of differentiating distinct FGR trajectories and characterizing persistent growth failure mechanisms. METHODS: Integrated proteomic and metabolomic profiling was performed on AF samples from transient FGR (n = 11), persistent FGR (n = 9), and healthy controls (n = 13). Diagnostic and prognostic models were developed using multivariate analysis. Selected protein candidates were validated via ELISA in an independent cohort (n = 69). RESULTS: Multi-omics analysis revealed distinct molecular signatures for FGR stratification. A two-protein diagnostic panel (PDGFA and phospho-STAT5A) achieved an AUC of 1.000 in the discovery stage and 0.780 in the external validation cohort. For prognostic assessment, a molecular signature including IREB2, HLA-C, and PLXNB2 accurately predicted persistent growth failure from transient recovery (AUC = 0.966). Cross-platform integration highlighted the mass spectrometry-derived WASHC2C as a central hub protein with a significant progressive increase across the control, transient, and persistent groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes a multi-omics framework for prenatal FGR stratification. Our findings identify distinct molecular signatures reflecting the intrauterine environment and provide high-performance molecular tools for predicting divergent fetal growth trajectories to guide personalized clinical decision-making.