16S/18S NGS metabarcoding supplements culture rather than replacing it in infectious keratitis
Investigators evaluated 16S/18S rRNA amplicon-based next-generation sequencing alongside conventional culture and PCR in 57 patients with infectious keratitis. The study reports that metabarcoding did not significantly improve overall diagnostic yield compared with standard methods alone (42% versus 51%, p=0.27) but raised the combined yield to 58%, identifying clinically relevant pathogens in 39% of cases. Concordance between the two approaches was 55%, and sampling the contralateral healthy eye improved pathogen interpretation in over a quarter of cases. These findings indicate that 16S/18S metabarcoding should be positioned as a targeted supplementary assay for atypical or culture-negative keratitis rather than a routine replacement for conventional microbiology.
The original study
16S/18S metabarcoding versus culture for aetiological assessment in infectious keratitis: A prospective paired-sample study.
- Authors
- Skovdal SM, Stensvold CR, Nielsen HV, Nielsen SE, Hjortdal J, Kristensen L, et al.
- Journal
- Acta ophthalmologica
- Type
- Journal Article
- PMID
- 42555167
Original abstract
PURPOSE: Infectious keratitis (IK) is a vision-threatening condition with diverse microbial aetiologies, yet conventional culture-based diagnostics often have limited sensitivity. We investigated whether 16S/18S rRNA amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) can enhance aetiological assessment when used alongside standard microbiological methods. METHODS: In this prospective paired-sample study, 57 patients with IK underwent corneal sampling with conventional culture, PCR (HSV/VZV and Acanthamoeba) and 16S/18S metabarcoding. Microbiological findings were interpreted in a structured workflow incorporating clinical correlation and comparison with samples from the contralateral healthy eye. RESULTS: Excluding entirely viral cases, NGS did not significantly increase the overall diagnostic outcome compared with culture and PCR alone (n = 53, 42% vs. 51%, p = 0.27) but improved the combined diagnostic yield (n = 53) to 58%. NGS identified clinically relevant pathogens in 39% of cases, including four cases not detected by culture, whereas culture identified nine cases missed by NGS. Concordance between methods was observed in 55% of positive cases. NGS on samples from the contralateral eye aided interpretation of NGS data in over 25% of cases by distinguishing commensal background from likely pathogens. Although microbiological findings led to treatment modification in 16% of cases, these were all in cases diagnosed by conventional methods. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, 16S/18S metabarcoding may be useful as a targeted supplementary test in atypical, refractory or culture-negative IK cases where conventional sampling is compromised. Findings should be interpreted alongside conventional microbiology, clinical findings and preferably contralateral-eye sampling.