Molecular Dx Significance 5/10

Combined qPCR and NGS workflow improves pathogen detection in culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections

Investigators evaluated a diagnostic workflow combining broad-range 16S rRNA qPCR screening with downstream next-generation sequencing for periprosthetic joint infection. In a cohort of 95 sonicate fluid and 276 tissue samples, the qPCR assay demonstrated high intrarater reliability (ICC 0.961) and achieved 80% sensitivity and 72% specificity against conventional cultures. The team established a 10⁵ CFU/mL biomass threshold to filter low-abundance environmental contaminants and reduce false positives in NGS results. This integrated approach successfully identified pathogens in culture-negative cases, including a polymicrobial profile and a low-level Staphylococcus strain later confirmed to cause delayed infection. The study provides a practical framework for molecular diagnostics laboratories to improve pathogen resolution and manage low-biomass orthopedic samples.

The original study

The diagnostic potential of combined quantitative polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing using the same primers for periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors
Ueda N, Inoue J, Okuda K, Iida H
Journal
Microbiology spectrum
Type
Journal Article
PMID
42517638
Read the original study →

Original abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables the detection of specific pathogens unidentifiable by conventional cultures, but its application in orthopedics remains inconsistent due to background contamination and irreproducible findings. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a novel workflow combining broad-range 16S rRNA gene quantitative PCR (qPCR) screening with downstream NGS, focusing on bacterial biomass thresholds. The qPCR assay demonstrated excellent intrarater reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.961 (95% confidence interval, 0.881 to 0.997). Based on serially diluted positive controls, a quantitative threshold of 10⁵ CFU/mL was established as the minimum concentration required for the consistent detection of fastidious taxa, such as Escherichia coli. When evaluated against conventional cultures using 95 sonicate fluid and 276 pre/intraoperative tissue samples, the qPCR assay achieved a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 72%. Subsequent NGS sequencing of 26 clinical samples and 9 controls showed concordance in 4 of 6 culture-positive infected cases with NGS taxonomy, whereas the remaining discrepancies were likely attributable to culture-based phenotypic misidentification. Notably, among the qPCR-positive cases, three were culture-negative, including two hip prosthesis loosening cases exhibiting polymicrobial profiles, and one post-traumatic osteoarthritis case harboring low-level Staphylococcus. Crucially, this post-traumatic patient developed delayed periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) 2 years post-surgery, with cultures identifying Staphylococcus previously detected by the initial NGS analysis. Integrating qPCR screening with targeted NGS effectively refines pathogen identification, filters environmental artifacts, and overcomes the diagnostic limitations of culture-negative infections in orthopedic practice.IMPORTANCENext-generation sequencing (NGS) enables the detection of specific pathogens in clinical samples that are not identifiable by conventional methods. However, NGS applications in orthopedics have not been quantitatively evaluated, and findings have been inconsistent owing to contaminants and the presence of non-credible causative organisms. These factors primarily stem from the failure to evaluate low-biomass samples and the absence of proper controls, such as negative controls or mock community DNA samples. This study demonstrates that interpreting results from low-biomass samples requires careful consideration because NGS relies on relative bacterial abundances; distinguishing likely pathogens from contaminants is particularly challenging when bacterial loads are low. We demonstrated that combining NGS with quantitative PCR (qPCR) and applying a Cq cutoff can reduce false positives.