Liquid Biopsy Significance 5/10

ctDNA monitoring in early breast cancer requires assay standardization and pre-analytical optimization

The study reports that circulating tumor DNA holds prognostic and minimal residual disease detection potential in early breast cancer but has not yet entered routine clinical practice. Investigators identify low and heterogeneous tumor DNA shedding alongside pre-analytical and analytical variability as primary barriers to reliable testing. The review outlines methodological standardization efforts and evaluates ctDNA utility across neoadjuvant response monitoring, postoperative surveillance, and longitudinal molecular tracking. These findings highlight the need for optimized specimen handling and validated assay platforms to support laboratory adoption and guide future therapeutic interception strategies.

The original study

Circulating tumor DNA in early breast cancer: Evidence, challenges, next steps.

Authors
Di Cosimo S, Appierto V, Reduzzi C, De Cecco L, Valenza C, Gerratana L, et al.
Journal
Cancer
Type
Journal Article, Review
PMID
42421646
Read the original study →

Original abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a tumor-derived, circulating bioanalyte that can be detected in blood using minimally invasive, blood-based biomarker procedures and has prognostic value in early breast cancer. Quantitative features of ctDNA, including baseline detectability and levels, have shown prognostic potential in early breast cancer by reflecting tumor burden and biologic aggressiveness, thereby supporting risk stratification. Post-treatment ctDNA detection may identify minimal residual disease and can precede radiologic or symptomatic recurrence by several months to years. Nevertheless, ctDNA has not yet been adopted in routine clinical practice in early breast cancer, partly because of biologic constraints, including low and heterogeneous tumor DNA shedding, as well as pre-analytical and analytical variability that can affect testing sensitivity. Ongoing efforts are focused on methodological standardization and clarification of the clinically actionable context. This narrative review examines the challenges in applying ctDNA to early breast cancer, spanning patient selection, sampling logistics, specimen handling, assay performance, and sources of assay failure. The authors outline determinants of ctDNA measurement that restrict the proportion of evaluable patients and limit translation to clinical practice and then summarize evidence supporting ctDNA for early response monitoring during neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative minimal residual disease detection, and longitudinal molecular surveillance. Finally, ctDNA-guided therapeutic interception strategies and emerging multimodal cell-free DNA approaches are discussed.