Molecular Dx Landmark-class

DeepGEM: Deep Learning Predicts Gene Mutations from Routine Histology Slides in Lung Cancer

This multicentre retrospective study developed an AI model (DeepGEM) that predicts driver gene mutations from routine histological biopsy images in lung cancer, trained on 3,637 patients across 16 hospitals. The model achieved AUC values of 0.80-0.97 across internal, external, and TCGA validation sets, and generalised to lymph node metastasis samples. DeepGEM generates spatial mutation maps and could provide rapid, economical mutation prediction as a screening tool to prioritise patients for confirmatory next-generation sequencing.

The original study

Deep learning using histological images for gene mutation prediction in lung cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.

Authors
Zhao Y, Xiong S, Ren Q, Wang J, Li M, Yang L, et al.
Journal
The Lancet. Oncology
Type
Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PMID
39653054
Read the original study →

Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate detection of driver gene mutations is crucial for treatment planning and predicting prognosis for patients with lung cancer. Conventional genomic testing requires high-quality tissue samples and is time-consuming and resource-consuming, and as a result, is not available for most patients, especially those in low-resource settings. We aimed to develop an annotation-free Deep learning-enabled artificial intelligence method to predict GEne Mutations (DeepGEM) from routinely acquired histological slides. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, we collected data for patients with lung cancer who had a biopsy and multigene next-generation sequencing done at 16 hospitals in China (with no restrictions on age, sex, or histology type), to form a large multicentre dataset comprising paired pathological image and multiple gene mutation information. We also included patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) publicly available dataset. Our developed model is an instance-level and bag-level co-supervised multiple instance learning method with label disambiguation design. We trained and initially tested the DeepGEM model on the internal dataset (patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China), and further evaluated it on the external dataset (patients from the remaining 15 centres) and the public TCGA dataset. Additionally, a dataset of patients from the same medical centre as the internal dataset, but without overlap, was used to evaluate the model's generalisation ability to biopsy samples from lymph node metastases. The primary objective was the performance of the DeepGEM model in predicting gene mutations (area under the curve [AUC] and accuracy) in the four prespecified groups (ie, the hold-out internal test set, multicentre external test set, TCGA set, and lymph node metastases set). FINDINGS: Assessable pathological images and multigene testing information were available for 3697 patients who had biopsy and multigene next-generation sequencing done between Jan 1, 2018, and March 31, 2022, at the 16 centres. We excluded 60 patients with low-quality images. We included 3767 images from 3637 consecutive patients (1978 [54·4%] men, 1514 [41·6%] women, 145 [4·0%] unknown; median age 60 years [IQR 52-67]), with 1716 patients in the internal dataset, 1718 patients in the external dataset, and 203 patients in the lymph node metastases dataset. The DeepGEM model showed robust performance in the internal dataset: for excisional biopsy samples, AUC values for gene mutation prediction ranged from 0·90 (95% CI 0·77-1·00) to 0·97 (0·93-1·00) and accuracy values ranged from 0·91 (0·85-0·98) to 0·97 (0·93-1·00); for aspiration biopsy samples, AUC values ranged from 0·85 (0·80-0·91) to 0·95 (0·86-1·00) and accuracy values ranged from 0·79 (0·74-0·85) to 0·99 (0·98-1·00). In the multicentre external dataset, for excisional biopsy samples, AUC values ranged from 0·80 (95% CI 0·75-0·85) to 0·91 (0·88-1·00) and accuracy values ranged from 0·79 (0·76-0·82) to 0·95 (0·93-0·96); for aspiration biopsy samples, AUC values ranged from 0·76 (0·70-0·83) to 0·87 (0·80-0·94) and accuracy values ranged from 0·76 (0·74-0·79) to 0·97 (0·96-0·98). The model also showed strong performance on the TCGA dataset (473 patients; 535 slides; AUC values ranged from 0·82 [95% CI 0·71-0·93] to 0·96 [0·91-1·00], accuracy values ranged from 0·79 [0·70-0·88] to 0·95 [0·90-1·00]). The DeepGEM model, trained on primary region biopsy samples, could be generalised to biopsy samples from lymph node metastases, with AUC values of 0·91 (95% CI 0·88-0·94) for EGFR and 0·88 (0·82-0·93) for KRAS and accuracy values of 0·85 (0·80-0·88) for EGFR and 0·95 (0·92-0·96) for KRAS and showed potential for prognostic prediction of targeted therapy. The model generated spatial gene mutation maps, indicating gene mutation spatial distribution. INTERPRETATION: We developed an AI-based method that can provide an accurate, tim