Anxiety Disorders: The Search for Objective Diagnostic Biomarkers
Anxiety disorders are the most prevalent mental health conditions globally yet remain diagnosed solely through clinical interview without laboratory confirmation. This Lancet review discusses genetic susceptibility, epigenetic modifications, and neurobiological circuit dysfunction as potential sources of future biomarkers. For diagnostics, the review underscores the gap between advancing molecular understanding of anxiety pathobiology and the complete absence of validated blood-based or imaging biomarkers for routine clinical use.
The original study
Anxiety disorders.
- Authors
- Penninx BW, Pine DS, Holmes EA, Reif A
- Journal
- Lancet (London, England)
- Type
- Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
- PMID
- 33581801
Original abstract
Anxiety disorders form the most common group of mental disorders and generally start before or in early adulthood. Core features include excessive fear and anxiety or avoidance of perceived threats that are persistent and impairing. Anxiety disorders involve dysfunction in brain circuits that respond to danger. Risk for anxiety disorders is influenced by genetic factors, environmental factors, and their epigenetic relations. Anxiety disorders are often comorbid with one another and with other mental disorders, especially depression, as well as with somatic disorders. Such comorbidity generally signifies more severe symptoms, greater clinical burden, and greater treatment difficulty. Reducing the large burden of disease from anxiety disorders in individuals and worldwide can be best achieved by timely, accurate disease detection and adequate treatment administration, scaling up of treatments when needed. Evidence-based psychotherapy (particularly cognitive behavioural therapy) and psychoactive medications (particularly serotonergic compounds) are both effective, facilitating patients' choices in therapeutic decisions. Although promising, no enduring preventive measures are available, and, along with frequent therapy resistance, clinical needs remain unaddressed. Ongoing research efforts tackle these problems, and future efforts should seek individualised, more effective approaches for treatment with precision medicine.