First US Surveillance Finds 7.5% Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae with Regional Variation
The first national surveillance program for Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the United States detected macrolide resistance in 7.5% of 360 specimens from 8 states (2015-2018), with significantly higher prevalence in the South and East (18.3%) than West (2.1%). The A2063G 23S rRNA mutation predominated. Although resistant infections showed no worse clinical outcomes in this cohort, prior macrolide exposure was a risk factor, highlighting the importance of ongoing molecular surveillance.
The original study
Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the United States as Determined from a National Surveillance Program.
- Authors
- Waites KB, Ratliff A, Crabb DM, Xiao L, Qin X, Selvarangan R, et al.
- Journal
- Journal of clinical microbiology
- Type
- Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
- PMID
- 31484701
Original abstract
There are sparse data to indicate the extent that macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMp) occurs in the United States or its clinical significance. Between 2015 and 2018, hospitals in 8 states collected and stored respiratory specimens that tested positive for M. pneumoniae and sent them to the University of Alabama at Birmingham, where real-time PCR was performed for detection of 23S rRNA mutations known to confer macrolide resistance. MRMp was detected in 27 of 360 specimens (7.5%). MRMp prevalence was significantly higher in the South and East (18.3%) than in the West (2.1%). A2063G was the predominant 23S rRNA mutation detected. MICs for macrolide-susceptible M. pneumoniae (MSMp) were ≤0.008 μg/ml, whereas MICs for MRMp were 16 to 32 μg/ml. Patients with MRMp infection were more likely to have a history of immunodeficiency or malignancy. Otherwise, there were no other significant differences in the clinical features between patients infected with MRMp and those infected with MSMp, nor were there any differences in radiographic findings, hospitalization rates, viral coinfections, the mean duration of antimicrobial treatment, or clinical outcomes. There was no significant change in MRMp incidence over time or according to age, sex, race/ethnicity, or status as an inpatient or an outpatient. Patients with MRMp were more likely to have received a macrolide prior to presentation, and their treatment was more likely to have been changed to a fluoroquinolone after presentation. This is the first national surveillance program for M. pneumoniae in the United States. Additional surveillance is needed to assess the clinical significance of MRMp and to monitor changes in MRMp prevalence.