JAMA Meta-Analysis: SGLT2 Inhibitors Reduce Kidney Progression and Death Regardless of Diabetes or Albuminuria
Pooling 58,816 participants from 8 RCTs, this meta-analysis found that SGLT2 inhibitors reduced kidney disease progression by 35% in diabetic and 26% in non-diabetic patients, with consistent relative benefits across albuminuria strata. Absolute benefits on kidney outcomes were greatest at UACR above 200 mg/g, but clear gains in hospitalisation reduction extended to lower albuminuria levels. The data support broad use of SGLT2 inhibitors across the CKD spectrum.
The original study
Effects of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors by Diabetes Status and Level of Albuminuria: A Meta-Analysis.
- Authors
- Staplin N, Roddick AJ, Neuen BL, Anker SD, Bhatt DL, Butler J, et al.
- Journal
- JAMA
- Type
- Journal Article, Meta-Analysis
- PMID
- 41202026
Original abstract
IMPORTANCE: There is uncertainty about the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in participants with chronic kidney disease, with guidelines offering different strengths of recommendation based on diabetes status and urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR). OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative and absolute effects of SGLT2 inhibitor use across efficacy and serious safety outcomes in participants stratified by diabetes status and UACR (≥200 mg/g or <200 mg/g). DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Included 8 randomized clinical trials that studied an SGLT2 inhibitor with a label indication for use in kidney disease and recorded longitudinal kidney outcomes and baseline data on albuminuria. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were combined using inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis; group-specific absolute effects were estimated by applying relevant relative risks to the event rates of the placebo groups. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Assessed the effects of SGLT2 inhibitor use on clinical efficacy and safety outcomes. Heterogeneity by baseline level of UACR was assessed separately by diabetes status. RESULTS: A total of 58 816 participants (mean age, 64 [SD, 10] years; 35% were female; 48 946 with diabetes and 9870 without diabetes) were included from trials comparing an SGLT2 inhibitor vs placebo. Allocation to an SGLT2 inhibitor produced a lower rate of kidney disease progression (33 vs 48 for placebo per 1000 patient-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.60-0.70] in those with diabetes and 32 vs 46 per 1000; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.63-0.85] in those without diabetes), a lower rate of acute kidney injury (14 vs 18 per 1000 [HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.87] with diabetes and 13 vs 18 per 1000 [HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92] without diabetes), a lower rate of any hospitalization (202 vs 231 per 1000 [HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.92] with diabetes and 203 vs 237 per 1000 [HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.95] without diabetes), and a lower rate of any death (42 vs 47 per 1000 [HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.91] with diabetes and 42 vs 48 per 1000 [HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.78-1.05] without diabetes). Diabetes-specific HRs were similar in participants (with a UACR ≥200 mg/g vs with a UACR <200 mg/g) considered separately. Higher absolute risk at a UACR of 200 mg/g or greater meant larger estimated absolute benefits on kidney disease progression were evident in this subgroup. Clear absolute benefits were evident for other efficacy outcomes, and particularly hospitalization, in participants with a UACR less than 200 mg/g. Net absolute benefits remained in the analyses of non-heart failure populations and when estimated glomerular filtration rate was less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Within the studied participants, there were clear absolute benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney, hospitalization, and mortality outcomes irrespective of diabetes status and level of UACR.