New Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods: cfDNA Blood Tests and Improved Stool Biomarkers
This Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology review evaluates emerging colorectal cancer screening technologies, including cell-free DNA blood tests and enhanced stool biomarker assays, against the backdrop of colonoscopy as the current standard. The authors analyse trade-offs between screening uptake, detection sensitivity for advanced precursor lesions, and cost-effectiveness. Blood-based cfDNA tests may improve screening compliance but face challenges in detecting precancerous polyps compared to stool-based and endoscopic approaches.
The original study
Novel colorectal cancer screening methods - opportunities and challenges.
- Authors
- McCabe MA, Mauro AJ, Schoen RE
- Journal
- Nature reviews. Clinical oncology
- Type
- Journal Article, Review
- PMID
- 40481325
Original abstract
Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death and the third most common incident cancer. CRC begins as adenomatous or serrated polyps, and in particular as advanced precursor lesions (APLs), which have the potential to progress into invasive cancers. Screening for CRC facilitates early detection and can identify cancers more amenable to cure, and can also detect and remove precursor lesions, thus also preventing CRC. Colonoscopy is the mainstay of screening in the USA and has the distinct advantage of enabling both detection and removal of precursors lesions. However, colonoscopy is burdensome, expensive and invasive, and often has negative findings. Non-invasive tests, such as testing stool samples for biomarkers of risk, have the potential to identify individuals who are more likely to benefit from colonoscopy. From a public health perspective, improving compliance with screening remains a priority. Technological innovations, including the emergence of new markers to improve stool testing and the development of blood tests that examine cell-free DNA have the potential to improve screening uptake and effectiveness. The trade-off between uptake of screening testing, detection of cancer and important precursor lesions such as APLs, and costs make for a complex calculus. In this Review, we describe the current state of CRC screening and evaluate the risks and benefits of new developments in screening.