Biomarkers Significance 7/10

Lipid Testing Is Evolving: Sampson-NIH Equation, ApoB, and Lp(a) Gain Ground Over Traditional LDL-C

This Clinical Chemistry review charts the shift in cardiovascular lipid testing from traditional LDL-C toward non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and Lp(a) as superior risk markers. The Sampson-NIH LDL-C equation is highlighted as more accurate than older calculations, particularly in patients with high triglycerides. For laboratories, the paper signals that test menus and reporting formats will need updating as guidelines increasingly adopt these newer lipid parameters.

The original study

The Present and Future of Lipid Testing in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.

Authors
White-Al Habeeb NMA, Higgins V, Wolska A, Delaney SR, Remaley AT, Beriault DR
Journal
Clinical chemistry
Type
Review, Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
PMID
37000150
Read the original study →

Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Lipids play a central role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Plasma lipids and lipoproteins are routinely measured to help identify individuals at high risk of developing CVD and to monitor patients' response to therapy. The landscape of lipid testing is rapidly changing, including new ways to estimate traditional lipid parameters (e.g., low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-C] calculations) and new lipid parameters that show superiority for risk prediction (e.g., non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [non-HDL-C], apolipoprotein B [apoB], and lipoprotein a [Lp(a)]). CONTENT: Various national guidelines for managing dyslipidemia to prevent CVD are available, which primarily focus on LDL-C for identifying those at high risk and setting thresholds for optimal response to therapy. However, LDL-C can be calculated and measured in various ways, each with advantages and disadvantages. Importantly, the recently established Sampson-NIH LDL-C equation appears to be superior to preceding calculations, as is clear from the literature and in guidelines. There is now a shift towards using lipid parameters other than LDL-C, such as non-HDL-C, apoB, and Lp(a), to identify high-risk patients and/or establish treatment targets. SUMMARY: The goal of this review is to discuss the present and future of lipid testing for CVD risk assessment through describing various national clinical guidelines, critically reviewing methods to calculate and measure LDL-C and discussing the clinical utility of additional lipid parameters.