Lab Medicine Significance 7/10

Machine Learning for AMR Prediction: Promise, Limitations, and the Path to Clinical Implementation

This review evaluates the growing use of machine learning to predict antimicrobial resistance from pathogen genomic data, identifying key limitations that must be addressed before clinical deployment. These include the treatment of genes as independent predictors without structural context, poor handling of novel resistance variants, and the need for model transparency and explainability to earn clinician trust.

The original study

Machine Learning for Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction: Current Practice, Limitations, and Clinical Perspective.

Authors
Kim JI, Maguire F, Tsang KK, Gouliouris T, Peacock SJ, McAllister TA, et al.
Journal
Clinical microbiology reviews
Type
Journal Article, Review
PMID
35612324
Read the original study →

Original abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health crisis that poses a great threat to modern medicine. Effective prevention strategies are urgently required to slow the emergence and further dissemination of AMR. Given the availability of data sets encompassing hundreds or thousands of pathogen genomes, machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to predict resistance to different antibiotics in pathogens based on gene content and genome composition. A key objective of this work is to advocate for the incorporation of ML into front-line settings but also highlight the further refinements that are necessary to safely and confidently incorporate these methods. The question of what to predict is not trivial given the existence of different quantitative and qualitative laboratory measures of AMR. ML models typically treat genes as independent predictors, with no consideration of structural and functional linkages; they also may not be accurate when new mutational variants of known AMR genes emerge. Finally, to have the technology trusted by end users in public health settings, ML models need to be transparent and explainable to ensure that the basis for prediction is clear. We strongly advocate that the next set of AMR-ML studies should focus on the refinement of these limitations to be able to bridge the gap to diagnostic implementation.