Best Practices for Neoantigen Prediction in Personalised Cancer Vaccines
Neoantigen-based immunotherapy requires a multi-step computational pipeline spanning somatic mutation calling, HLA typing, and peptide-MHC binding prediction, yet no consensus workflow exists. This review provides practical recommendations for each step including prioritisation, delivery, and validation of candidate neoantigens. Key gaps include poor HLA class II typing accuracy and lack of clinical response data to refine prediction algorithms.
The original study
Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility.
- Authors
- Richters MM, Xia H, Campbell KM, Gillanders WE, Griffith OL, Griffith M
- Journal
- Genome medicine
- Type
- Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
- PMID
- 31462330
Original abstract
Neoantigens are newly formed peptides created from somatic mutations that are capable of inducing tumor-specific T cell recognition. Recently, researchers and clinicians have leveraged next generation sequencing technologies to identify neoantigens and to create personalized immunotherapies for cancer treatment. To create a personalized cancer vaccine, neoantigens must be computationally predicted from matched tumor-normal sequencing data, and then ranked according to their predicted capability in stimulating a T cell response. This candidate neoantigen prediction process involves multiple steps, including somatic mutation identification, HLA typing, peptide processing, and peptide-MHC binding prediction. The general workflow has been utilized for many preclinical and clinical trials, but there is no current consensus approach and few established best practices. In this article, we review recent discoveries, summarize the available computational tools, and provide analysis considerations for each step, including neoantigen prediction, prioritization, delivery, and validation methods. In addition to reviewing the current state of neoantigen analysis, we provide practical guidance, specific recommendations, and extensive discussion of critical concepts and points of confusion in the practice of neoantigen characterization for clinical use. Finally, we outline necessary areas of development, including the need to improve HLA class II typing accuracy, to expand software support for diverse neoantigen sources, and to incorporate clinical response data to improve neoantigen prediction algorithms. The ultimate goal of neoantigen characterization workflows is to create personalized vaccines that improve patient outcomes in diverse cancer types.