Point of Care Significance 7/10

Cobas h232 Point-of-Care NT-proBNP Test Proves Accurate and Practice-Changing in Primary Care Heart Failure Workup

A multicentre evaluation of the Cobas h232 point-of-care NT-proBNP device across five GP groups and 94 patients demonstrated strong analytical agreement with central laboratory measurement (Passing-Bablok slope 1.05, R-squared 0.97). Eighteen of 19 GPs confirmed the device influenced clinical practice, and physician confidence in using NT-proBNP increased significantly during the study period.

The original study

Accuracy, user-friendliness and usefulness of the Cobas h232 point-of-care test for NT-proBNP in primary care.

Authors
Hex C, Smeets M, Penders J, Van Hoof V, Verbakel J, Buntinx F, et al.
Journal
Journal of clinical pathology
Type
Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PMID
29263170
Read the original study →

Original abstract

AIMS: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been shown to be useful for ruling out heart failure in primary care. In this study, we examined the accuracy of the Cobas h232 point-of-care (POC) instrument in primary care compared with an in-hospital measurement. Furthermore, we investigated the user-friendliness and usefulness of the POC device. METHODS: Five general practitioner (GP) groups were asked to evaluate adult patients who were suspected of having heart failure and to test NT-proBNP with the Cobas h232. The samples were subsequently delivered to and analysed at a central hospital laboratory by the Cobas e602 using conventional transport and storage. Difference between the paired measurements was analysed using a percentage difference plot, and correlation was assessed using Passing-Bablok linear regression analysis. User-friendliness and usefulness were assessed using semistructured questionnaires. RESULTS: Nineteen GPs studied 94 patients. Passing-Bablok analysis showed a slope of 1.05 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.11) (R2=0.97). The percentage difference plot showed a mean difference of 15.7% (95% CI -46.0% to -77.4%). User-friendliness and usefulness had median scores of 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert scale. Eighteen out of 19 GPs confirmed that the device influenced their clinical practice. During the study, GPs' confidence in using NT-proBNP increased significantly from a mean score of 4.4 (95% CI 3.2 to 5.6) to 7.6 out of 10 (95% CI 7.1 to 8.2). CONCLUSIONS: The Cobas h232 NT-proBNP POC test proved to be an accurate, user-friendly and useful test in primary care. Nearly all participating GPs were convinced that the test could benefit clinical decision making.