Cobas h232 Point-of-Care NT-proBNP Test Proves Accurate and Practice-Changing in Primary Care Heart Failure Workup
A multicentre evaluation of the Cobas h232 point-of-care NT-proBNP device across five GP groups and 94 patients demonstrated strong analytical agreement with central laboratory measurement (Passing-Bablok slope 1.05, R-squared 0.97). Eighteen of 19 GPs confirmed the device influenced clinical practice, and physician confidence in using NT-proBNP increased significantly during the study period.
The original study
Accuracy, user-friendliness and usefulness of the Cobas h232 point-of-care test for NT-proBNP in primary care.
- Authors
- Hex C, Smeets M, Penders J, Van Hoof V, Verbakel J, Buntinx F, et al.
- Journal
- Journal of clinical pathology
- Type
- Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study
- PMID
- 29263170
Original abstract
AIMS: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been shown to be useful for ruling out heart failure in primary care. In this study, we examined the accuracy of the Cobas h232 point-of-care (POC) instrument in primary care compared with an in-hospital measurement. Furthermore, we investigated the user-friendliness and usefulness of the POC device. METHODS: Five general practitioner (GP) groups were asked to evaluate adult patients who were suspected of having heart failure and to test NT-proBNP with the Cobas h232. The samples were subsequently delivered to and analysed at a central hospital laboratory by the Cobas e602 using conventional transport and storage. Difference between the paired measurements was analysed using a percentage difference plot, and correlation was assessed using Passing-Bablok linear regression analysis. User-friendliness and usefulness were assessed using semistructured questionnaires. RESULTS: Nineteen GPs studied 94 patients. Passing-Bablok analysis showed a slope of 1.05 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.11) (R2=0.97). The percentage difference plot showed a mean difference of 15.7% (95% CI -46.0% to -77.4%). User-friendliness and usefulness had median scores of 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert scale. Eighteen out of 19 GPs confirmed that the device influenced their clinical practice. During the study, GPs' confidence in using NT-proBNP increased significantly from a mean score of 4.4 (95% CI 3.2 to 5.6) to 7.6 out of 10 (95% CI 7.1 to 8.2). CONCLUSIONS: The Cobas h232 NT-proBNP POC test proved to be an accurate, user-friendly and useful test in primary care. Nearly all participating GPs were convinced that the test could benefit clinical decision making.