IMWG Consensus Criteria Define MRD Negativity as New Response Endpoint in Multiple Myeloma
The International Myeloma Working Group established consensus criteria for minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma, defining new response categories based on flow cytometry, gene sequencing, and sensitive imaging techniques. These MRD-negative endpoints address the limitation of conventional serum and urine-based response criteria, which cannot distinguish between complete response and deeper remissions now achievable with modern therapies. The framework enables uniform MRD reporting within and outside clinical trials, marking a paradigm shift in how treatment depth is measured.
The original study
International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma.
- Authors
- Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al.
- Journal
- The Lancet. Oncology
- Type
- Journal Article, Review, Consensus Statement
- PMID
- 27511158
Original abstract
Treatment of multiple myeloma has substantially changed over the past decade with the introduction of several classes of new effective drugs that have greatly improved the rates and depth of response. Response criteria in multiple myeloma were developed to use serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins and bone marrow assessment (which is relatively insensitive). Given the high rates of complete response seen in patients with multiple myeloma with new treatment approaches, new response categories need to be defined that can identify responses that are deeper than those conventionally defined as complete response. Recent attempts have focused on the identification of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow using flow cytometry or gene sequencing. Furthermore, sensitive imaging techniques can be used to detect the presence of residual disease outside of the bone marrow. Combining these new methods, the International Myeloma Working Group has defined new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based absence of extramedullary disease, to allow uniform reporting within and outside clinical trials. In this Review, we clarify several aspects of disease response assessment, along with endpoints for clinical trials, and highlight future directions for disease response assessments.